(Read the entire post as the first point outlines a few of the things Powell talked about Sunday when he endorsed Barack Obama for President)
On Sunday former Sectary of State Collin Powell announced he was going to support Barack Obama for President of the United States. He played out the usual Obama party line but did it with a little more flare.
He was critical of McCain as to not having a solid economic plan to help the middle class. However he never addressed or was asked how Obama’s tax rebate for the “middle class” did less then provide a large rebate check to those who do not pay any federal taxes currently.
He went on to be critical of McCain for the comment of some lady in a crowd that Obama was Muslin. In fact Powell went to get length to hammer this subject as though people within the McCain campaign had said such. He did not even acknowledge that McCain took the microphone from the lady and denied Obama was such.
Powell then moved on to the issue of people in Sarah Palin campaign rally crowd yelled “kill him” and “terrorist” in reference to Obama. This issue was first brought to the attention to the media and public via Obama campaign officials. Not one media outlet reported hearing such on the day it was suppose to have happened. In follow up investigation the Secret Service investagated the claims. They talked to their own agents attending the event that where scatter all over the crowd in their protection of Palin. The Secret Service also talked to police officers, civilian ushers, and others attending the event. NOT ONE OF THEM HEARD EITHER SET OF WORDS!
Of course this is the same guy that stood before the public, the UN, and Congress telling them that Iraq still had weapons of mass destruction. Many in the public, the UN, and Congress believed him. This turned out to be a lie. On Sunday Powell tried to pass this off on to some other members of President Bush’s staff.
Powell is the same person who first investigated the My Lai Massacre in Vietnam by US Soldiers. He issued a report that stated, “In direct refutation of this portrayal is the fact that relations between American soldiers and the Vietnamese people are excellent.” Further investagation proved Powell lied. In 2004 Powell, on the Larry King Show, pretty much stated this is just something that happens in war.
NOW FOR THE FINANCAIL WHORE
In 2005 Powell joined Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a venture capitol firm located near San Francisco, California. He joined and was given the newly-created position of "strategic limited partner." Which means to us poor saps is he brought no money to the fund but will be cut into the action, based on what he can do for them. Then in 2007 Al Gore joined the firm as a partner.
In April 2008 Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers announced they where trying to raise $400 million to invest in green technology to be used as venture capitol into start up companies. They pictured billion dollar payoffs from investments.
KPCB has publicized its plan to put as many as 50,000 electric cars on U.S. roads by late next year (2009) and would be produced just south of San Francisco. The venture will be called Think North America and be based in Menlo Park, California.
Obama has promised to provide tax cuts for people purchasing new electric cars. This would encourage people to purchase these cars. Also Obama has promised to cut to zero capitol gains tax made by companies in this kind of business for two years. Obama has offered other tax cuts for new start up companies like this one.
This company made billions of dollars by taking such companies like Netscape when sold to American On Line. It appears KPCB made just under one billion dollars. Another investment of KPCB was the $8 million invested and returned to them two billion on the sale of Cerent to Cisco Systems.
Powell is a two time self admitted liar and now can add financial whore to his resume. He just sold out the general public for his own financial wealth.
Sunday, October 19, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I disse dage omtales afdødede Ekrem Sahin og hans situation i Fængslet, hvorfor jeg mener at man burde se tingende fra begge sider og ikke kun fra den danske side eller kontra tyrkisk side.
Vi har et godt ordsprog på tyrkisk som lyder: Ne ekersen, onu bicersin/Hvad du sår, høster du.
Jeg vil i bedste mulige måde prøve at definere og fremligge min mening om denne sag som jeg håber vil åbne op for en kritisk dog demokratisk debat...
Vi blir nød til at se på Ekrem Sahin´s fortid i denne debat og hvad han har "ydet" for det danske system. I bedste fald om han har været en "overlast" i det danske system som naturligvis ikke er gyldig grund til hans død i Fængsel. Ekrem Sahin har utallige gange medvirket direktig/indirektig i vold, overfald, knivstikkerig, røverig, salgsmål og har i denne forbindelse været i klammerig med ordensmagten op til utallige gange.. Er det acceptabelt??? Er det acceptabelt at jeg og andre skatte ydere skal "betale" via vores lidt dårlige sociale velfærdssystem for en kriminel og hans adfærd? Hvad koster Ekrem Sahin og andre ligende borger i dette samfund? Tænker vi over det?
Naturligvis er det dybt sørgeligt at Sahin familien har mistet en ung gut.. Men har de tænkt over hvad de (i dette tilfælde ansvarlige forældre, som desuden er skildte) har givet deres søn Ekrem Sahin? Har de været der for ham? Hvordan har det været for Ekrem Sahin at være skildsmisse barn og rende rundt med andre kriminelle for at blive "accepteret"? Hvorfor er Ekrem Sahin endt som kriminel? Når man høre familien (Sahin) lyder de naturligvis til at være velintigreret, demokratisk - og mon?
Jeg vil hermed også fremskynde nogle informationer/udplug fra andre "private" medier om netop Ekrem Sahin:
"Glasskår fra en kraftig råglasrude mellem de toppede brosten på hjørnet af Rådhustorvet og Klostergade vidner om, at ikke alle lige begejstrede for at sidde i »venterummet« under Vejle Kriminalret, der har til huse på Vejle Rådhus… Den 15-årige var sammen med to kammerater på 16 år, hvoraf den ene, Ekrem Sahin , også har en udenlandsk baggrund, tiltalt for røveri dels mod tre unge mænd i Vedelsgade tidligt om natten søndag den 27. april dels mod en taxachauffør på Uhrhøj kort før midnat samme dag…"
"To af de tre unge forklarede som vidner, at Sahin bevidst var gået ind i den ene for at fremprovokere et eller andet, og pludselig viftede han med en kniv, og med den truede han de tre til at udlevere et halvt hundrede kroner og en mobiltelefon… Om aftenen var de tre venner igen en tur i byen, og pludselig befandt de sig nær taxakøen på Nørretorv…."
"Pludselig havde den 16-årige trukket en pistol, som han pegede på chaufføren med, og mens han stirrede ham ind i øjnene, forlangte han at få udleveret penge. Samtidig blev han ramt af et knytnæveslag på højre kæbe – affyret af Sahin, mens den somaliske dreng bagfra tog halsgreb på ham. Sahim var steget ud af taxaen og gået om til fordøren, hvor han krævede flere penge…"
"Ekrem Sahin har en ualmindelig blakket fortid med blandt andet røveri og overfald. Han har været anbragt på en sikret institution, men stak alligevel af, og den 19. maj i år blev han kendt skyldig i disse forhold og løsladt, fordi han havde været indespærret i seks måneder. Få dage senere blev straffen fastsat til et års fængsel, men da havde han allerede begået røverierne i Vejle… Domsmandsretten var i går ikke i tvivl om, at Ekrem Sahin var hovedmanden bag røverierne i Vejle, og han blev trods sine kun 16 år idømt et år og ni måneders ubetinget fængsel.”
Det betyder naturligvis stadig ikke at Ekrem Sahin skulle dø på den måde som han nu gjorde i fægslet......
Post a Comment